Tag Archives: targeted advertising

Updating regulations to protect children online

Students from Noble and Greenough School in Dedham, Mass., including Emily Woodward, above, said they all use the Internet regularly, but they do not ask for parental permission. (Mattias Gugel/Medill)

WASHINGTON — The Republican and Democrat who head the Congressional Privacy Caucus are leading an effort to pass a bill that would tighten regulations on companies collecting personal information about children online, specifically focusing on mobile communications and targeted advertising.

The Do Not Track Kids Act of 2011 is an attempt to update online protections already established for children in The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. Congress passed COPPA in 1998 as an attempt to protect the personal information of children online, but it does not address privacy issues that have arisen from new technology over the last dozen years.

So, Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., introduced a bill that would require the Federal Communications Commission to enforce guidelines limiting the capability of websites, mobile providers or advertisers to use personal data of children 13 and younger.

At a news conference announcing the bill, Markey and Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, co-chairs of the Congressional Privacy Caucus, both expressed concern over children’s online activities that could harm their well-being and future careers

Markey said people should not be denied jobs because of a picture they posted when they were younger.  He also said that a girl who searches one time for weight loss information should not be targeted with weight-loss ads every time she goes online because a company has profiled her as a young female interested in weight loss.

This bill would stop companies from tracking minors online without the consent of parents, and it would restrict the use of targeted advertising. This measure also proposes an “eraser button” that would allow parents to remove any information about their child stored on the Web.

“Parents deserve to know what types of information are being collected about their kids online and how it is being used,” said Barton, a co-sponsor of the bill. “If you don’t like what you learn – our bill will give you the authority to change it with just the click of a mouse.”

As mobile communications become more popular, this bill aims to protect children who uses mobile devices to communicate, such as cell phones and tablets, many of which have tracking components.

Emma Llanso, policy counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology, said she appreciates the bipartisan attention this bill has received, but she believes all Internet users should get the proposed protections, regardless of age. She said the spirit of the Do Not Track Kids Act is good, but the bill could lead to mandatory age verification, increased collection of personal information from Internet users and the infringement of teenagers’ rights to access lawful speech online.

Actor Nick Cannon, celebrity spokesman for Common Sense Media, a group that advocates for children’s safe use of technology, spoke in support of the bill at the hearing. He said that even if COPPA is updated to better regulate companies gathering information on the Internet, parents still need to check what their children are doing online.

“Most at that age don’t have the judgment or the maturity to protect themselves from those capable of taking advantage of them by tracking their whereabouts on the Internet,” the America’s Got Talent host said. “Parental supervision should extend from the playground to the internet.”

Facebook requires that its members be at least 13 years old, but that does not prevent underage minors from signing up by saying they’re older and using the social network. According to a Consumer Reports study released last May, 7.5 million Facebook users in the U.S. are under the age of 13; 5 million are under 10.

Children under 13 who post information on Facebook that can be viewed publicly foil safeguards afforded by COPPA, which prohibits sites from knowingly disclosing children’s personally identifiable information.

Eighth graders from Noble and Greenough School in Dedham, Mass., attended the hearing to see their congressman, Markey, during a class trip to Washington. At the end of the news conference, they were asked to raise their hands if they use the Internet on a daily basis — all of the students’ hands went up. But when asked how many asked for parental permission, none raised their hands.

Student Mimi Connors, 14, said after the hearing that privacy on the Internet is not a problem she faces right now, but she might care “maybe when I’m older.”

Children ages 8 to 18 spend an average of an hour and a half online daily, an increase of 45 percent from five years prior, according to a study by the Kaiser Family Foundation in January 2010. Cell phone ownership also has increased dramatically, growing from 39 percent of 8- to 18-year-olds in 2004 to 66 percent in 2009.

“Tracking our most vulnerable, our young children, must be outlawed and I am delighted that Congress is finally taking the necessary action with the Do Not Track Kids Act,” said Cannon, a father of 10-month-old twins. “The bipartisan effort demonstrates that the two parties can actually agree on at least one thing — the safety of our children. Kids make up 20 percent of our population but 100 percent of our future.”

Online privacy defined by the marketplace, not government

CHICAGO — If you visit a website, without logging into your Facebook account, and are welcomed by a Facebook-themed message citing your name and showing your profile picture, would you be excited or uncomfortable? Continue reading

Giving It Up to Cyberspace

CHICAGO — As I type my credit card number into the blank space on Target’s online store, I’m strangely aware of how much of myself I’m relinquishing. With a click of a button, the card number, my address, and the wedding gift I purchased vanish into cyberspace. And yet, when a box pops up, asking if I want to share my thoughts of my online experience in a survey, I’m bothered.

Perhaps it’s the articles earlier this month in the New York Times and MarketingVOX about how coupons can be traced directly back to the person who used it. Or a story that Orayb Aref Najjar, a journalism professor at Northern Illinois University who specializes in cyber-communities and freedom of the press, said she recently read about how the information collected from a person is then interpreted and can be used against them.

“If you buy certain products … that means you are likely to pay your mortgage on time,” Najjar said in an e-mail. “So the information they collect about you is not neutral, and is not there to serve you … but to be bundled and sold …

“What worries me most is not the information gathered (governments always do that), but the extent and volume of information gathered and collated from different sources, and the way it may be interpreted. I worry about the competency of the interpreters. The issue becomes more crucial when it comes to information gathered internationally.”

Jay Stanley, public education director of ACLU’s Technology and Liberty Program, said Americans do not understand “the extent to which the information they give to one institution is stored, used, traded and combined.”

Yes, people willingly give out information to online stores and social networks. But some people also give out information unwillingly, Stanley said. They would rather not share their Social Security number and other personal information just because it’s required on some form.

Either way, Stanley says the consequences of that information sharing is mostly invisible to the individual. But over time, it is becoming more apparent how that information is being used, he said.

The ACLU is part of the Digital Due Process coalition, along with Google, AT&T, Microsoft, and technology and privacy groups, to get Congress to update the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Though the changes are not expected to drastically affect information gathering for the purposes of national security and marketing, Stanley said it is a stop toward making sure there is a proper process in place to broadly protect online privacy.

“With changes in technology, the substantive privacy we’ve always enjoyed is rapidly eroding,” Stanley said.